2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1965 Steyr 500D
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 500D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 500D would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 500D. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 500D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1176 kg more than 1965 Steyr 500D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 500D. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 500D.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 1965 Steyr 500D | |
Make | Cadillac | Steyr |
Model | XLR | 500D |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1850 mm |