2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP) has 267 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 676 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | XLR | 1300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2430 mm |