2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1980 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1980 Mini Clubman.
Because 2006 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1980 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1980 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 1980 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | XLR | Clubman |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2140 mm |