2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1982 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 696 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: