2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 336 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | XLR | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2680 mm |