2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Because 2006 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (423 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | XLR | Zeta |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |