2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 2001 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 671 kg more than 2006 Cadillac XLR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (423 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac XLR 2001 Ford Econoline
Make Cadillac Ford
Model XLR Econoline
Year Released 2006 2001
Body Type Convertible Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4563 cc 4194 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 322 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4700 RPM
Torque 423 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1654 kg 2325 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 3510 mm