2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 620 kg more than 2006 Cadillac XLR.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac XLR. (423 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | XLR | Armada |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |