2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 126 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | XLR | K2700 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |