2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (322 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2006 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (423 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (320 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | XLR | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |