2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 2013 BMW X1
To start off, 2013 BMW X1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2013 BMW X1. (296 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2013 BMW X1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X1 weights approximately 109 kg more than 2006 Cadillac XLR.
Because 2013 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 BMW X1. (407 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 BMW X1.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac XLR | 2013 BMW X1 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | XLR | X1 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.2 :1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4484 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2044 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1545 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 63 L |