2006 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,497 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (83 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Aveo | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Aveo | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 746 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 33 L |