2006 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (71 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (105 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Aveo | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Aveo | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1150 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |