2006 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (140 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Aveo. (83 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 1282 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda 323 (164 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Aveo. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Aveo | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Aveo | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 164 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |