2006 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,497 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Aveo. (83 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Aveo | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Aveo | Puma |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1388 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 42 L |