2006 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Aveo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Aveo would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 456 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Aveo | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Aveo | Rustler |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1586 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 77 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 54 L |
