2006 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 2,403 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 790 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Captiva | 1980 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Captiva | Sapporo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2403 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |
