2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (171 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (221 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Cobalt | Cortina |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 90 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |