2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 181 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Cobalt | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |