2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 80 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Cobalt | Caprice |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 6999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3030 mm |