2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (171 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 32 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1965 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Cobalt | Munga |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 31 L |