2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (143 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 386 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cobalt | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 45 L |