2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 128 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Cobalt | E |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
