2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1993 Rover 200

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (94 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 144 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (124 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Cobalt 1993 Rover 200
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Cobalt 200
Year Released 2006 1993
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2189 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 124 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94.5 mm 79 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1266 kg 1122 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1410 mm