2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 235 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Cobalt | CSX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |