2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Cobalt | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |