2006 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1274 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Cobalt | Karma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 36 L |
