2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Chevrolet | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Colorado | 6C |
Year Released | 2006 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2442 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.6 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 77 L |