2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 640 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Colorado | Munga |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 31 L |