2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 Morgan 4
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1506 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Morgan |
| Model | Colorado | 4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2166 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2450 mm |
