2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1963 Morris Oxford. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Morris Oxford.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
Model | Colorado | Oxford |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1622 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 45 L |