2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 665 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Colorado | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2540 mm |