2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 496 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Colorado | 312 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 43 L |