2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1966 DKW F 102
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 840 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1966 DKW F 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Colorado | F 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2769 cc | 1175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 31 L |
