2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
Model | Colorado | 280Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2753 cc |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |