2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Colorado | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2680 mm |