2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1990 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. (139 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1990 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3791 cc |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 45 L |