2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Colorado | Maloo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |