2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2002 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500.
Because 2002 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda B2500. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 2002 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Colorado | B2500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2499 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2990 mm |