2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2003 Lada Calina 1118
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada Calina 1118. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada Calina 1118 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1086 kg more than 2003 Lada Calina 1118.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lada Calina 1118. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 2003 Lada Calina 1118 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Colorado | Calina 1118 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 99.1 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2166 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |