2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2012 Mazda 2

To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2.

Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Colorado 2012 Mazda 2
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Colorado 2
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Pickup Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2770 cc 1500 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 173 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5270 mm 3920 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1695 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1475 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2489 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 43 L