2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1095 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Colorado | Cooper |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |