2006 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 6,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Corvette (637 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Corvette | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Corvette | Maloo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6998 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 506 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 637 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |