2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 275 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.

Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk has manual transmission. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Epica 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
Make Chevrolet Studebaker
Model Epica Sky Hawk
Year Released 2006 1956
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 2779 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5150 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2980 mm