2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.

Because 1967 Mercury Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Epica 1967 Mercury Brougham
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model Epica Brougham
Year Released 2006 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 6990 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 340 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 627 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3130 mm