2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1968 DAF 44
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 780 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (195 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Epica | 1968 DAF 44 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Epica | 44 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 65 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2260 mm |