2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1968 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 425 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Epica | 1968 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Epica | Munga |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 31 L |