2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1972 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 720 kg more than 1972 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Epica | 1972 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Epica | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |
