2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1993 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Epica | 1993 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Epica | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |
