2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (195 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Epica | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Epica | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2560 mm |